If your products have regular and stable characteristics, hard automation makes sense. If however each product is different, flexible automation or robotics should be favored.

Four Points You Need to Consider when Thinking About Automating or Robotizing Your Operations

Contributed by | Axium


4 Things That Will Help You Make a More Informed Decision About Automating or Robotizing Your Operations


1. Why do you want to automate or robotize?

Is it to increase throughput, reduce cost, lower waste, improve quality, add flexibility or avoid safety issues? There is no “perfect” automation project that will solve all of those problems at once. A choice has to be made. Of course, all manufacturers want to improve their OEE, which reflects productivity and quality. The main objective of your project needs to be determined in advance in order to give you a direction for the following steps and help you to choose the best technologies.


2. In what phase of the lifecycle is your product?

Your product’s lifecycle phase is usually a good place to start. If it’s in the “introduction” or “growth” phases, your motive for automation is probably to increase throughput to fuel the upward path of sales. If your products are in the “maturity” phase, where profit margins drop as competition increases, automation is usually done to reduce costs.


3. What is the lifecycle time of your product or task?

In the case where your product does not change much (or very little) over time, hard automation might be an appropriate approach. If you’re in the opposite situation where your products need regular updates or improvements, flexible automation or robotics should be considered.

For example, a company that always palletizes the same size of box will first consider a standard automated palletizer. They are efficient and well known, but they can be a pain when you decide to change your box’s format.

At the other end of the spectrum, let’s say you’re operating a distribution center and have to palletize various products; flexible automation based on robotics is the only practical solution. In this later case, a mixed load-palletizing cell provides the flexibility to handle the wide variety of products.


4. Are your products always the same (geometry, dimensions, weight) or are they different from one to the other?

If your products have regular and stable characteristics, hard automation makes sense. If however each product is different, flexible automation or robotics should be favored.

For example, if a plastic fuel tank manufacturer produces the same model in its production line for a few years, it should probably consider a dedicated approach using hard automation. It’s normally less expensive and easier to implement. Solutions offered by B+R Maschinenbau meet these characteristics.

Other plastic tank manufacturers that produce various models on the same line will want a robotized approach where simple parameter change enables the system to switch easily to another model. Such robotized cell are offered by Axium.


Comments (0)

This post does not have any comments. Be the first to leave a comment below.

Post A Comment

You must be logged in before you can post a comment. Login now.

Featured Product

Bitflow is the leader in CoaXPress

Bitflow is the leader in CoaXPress

With the introduction of its Cyton and Karbon CXP frame grabbers, BitFlow has established itself as the leader in CoaXPress (CXP), a simple, yet powerful, standard for moving high speed serial data from a camera to a frame grabber. With CXP, video is captured at speeds of up to 6.25 Gigabits/Second (Gb/S). Simultaneously, control commands and triggers can be sent to the camera 20 Mb/S (with a trigger accuracy of +/- 2 nanoseconds). Up to 13 W of power can also supplied to the camera. All this happens over a single piece of industry standard 75 Ohm coaxial cable. Multiple CXP links can be aggregated to support higher data rates (e.g. four links provide 25 Gb/S of data). BitFlow CXP frame grabbers open the door to applications where cable cost, routing requirements and long distances have prevented the move to high resolution, high speed digital cameras. In many cases, existing coaxial infrastructure can be repurposed for CXP with very low installation costs.